Members Login
Post Info TOPIC: King Anouvong V/s Chao Lane Khamdeng.
Anonymous

Date:
King Anouvong V/s Chao Lane Khamdeng.
Permalink   


Who was the best fighter in to defeat the enemies in Lane Xang history in between King Anouvong and Chao Lane Khamdeng?

How come Laos PDR's skipping to teach young Lao generation about King Ounheuan ( or Pra-Chao Samsenthai ) and Chao Lane Khamdeng?



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

You know these Great KING I thing

you know the answer ?



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

The Greatest Kings of Laos.

  ☼. Prachao Ngyuen Kaison  Phomvihan

     ☼.    Prachao  Ho Chi Minh,

     ☼.    Prachao Pham Van Dong,

     ☼.    Prachao Vo Van Giap,

     ☼.    Prachao Khamtay Siphandone

     ☼.    Prachao  Nouhak Phomsavanh.

Their contribution to our beloved country is enormous

and immeasurable. Satu, Satu..



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:

You know these Great KING I thing

you know the answer ?


 Jusy wonder!

How come most of Lao people are calling King Anouvong is Great King, even he wasn't defeated the enemy Siamese and he Couldn't save 3/4 LaneXang land to the Siamese.    Chao Lane Khamdeng was Striking back and defeated the enemy Anamese in Lane Xang history but, Laos PDR is not even allowing new Lao Historian to write in new Laos PDR history book for school teaching.   I see so many of Lao PDR people are blaming Thailand were changed the history of Lao Esaan to blindfold Khon Lao Esaan. How come don't they balame their own government?



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:

Who was the best fighter in to defeat the enemies in Lane Xang history in between King Anouvong and Chao Lane Khamdeng?

How come Laos PDR's skipping to teach young Lao generation about King Ounheuan ( or Pra-Chao Samsenthai ) and Chao Lane Khamdeng?


 You can't compared this two era, Things that occured about 400 hundred apart. C'm on man.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

You know these Great KING I thing

you know the answer ?


 Jusy wonder!

How come most of Lao people are calling King Anouvong is Great King, even he wasn't defeated the enemy Siamese and he Couldn't save 3/4 LaneXang land to the Siamese.    Chao Lane Khamdeng was Striking back and defeated the enemy Anamese in Lane Xang history but, Laos PDR is not even allowing new Lao Historian to write in new Laos PDR history book for school teaching.   I see so many of Lao PDR people are blaming Thailand were changed the history of Lao Esaan to blindfold Khon Lao Esaan. How come don't they balame their own government?


 Did you know why Chao Anouvong lost the war to Siam ? Not because of the Siam is bigger or more powerful armies, So give me the answer and I will give you mine... if you don't know I will not continue to debate you about lao history.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

YOU ARE SO SO STUPID TO CALL ALL THESE PEOPLE KING !! THEY ARE NOT KINGS YOU DUMB ASS!!

 ☼. Prachao Ngyuen Kaison  Phomvihan

     ☼.    Prachao  Ho Chi Minh,

     ☼.    Prachao Pham Van Dong,

     ☼.    Prachao Vo Van Giap,

     ☼.    Prachao Khamtay Siphandone

     ☼.    Prachao  Nouhak Phomsavanh.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

 Did you know why Chao Anouvong lost the war to Siam ? Not because of the Siam is bigger or more powerful armies, So give me the answer and I will give you mine... if you don't know I will not continue to debate you about lao history.


King Anouvong lost the war to siam because of stupid Lane Xang Kings wasn't sticking together during that time. Lao killing Lao instead of Lao killing siamese.  There was so stupid kings were raced to be top king.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

 Did you know why Chao Anouvong lost the war to Siam ? Not because of the Siam is bigger or more powerful armies, So give me the answer and I will give you mine... if you don't know I will not continue to debate you about lao history.


King Anouvong lost the war to siam because of stupid Lane Xang Kings wasn't sticking together during that time. Lao killing Lao instead of Lao killing siamese.  There was so stupid kings were raced to be top king.


 Ding Dong, Now I know that you're really knew our lao history. and I'll give you triple A brothers/Sisters. Well you already gave me the answer so I think I don't reakly have nothing say anymore. Yes, you're 1000000000000000% right of what you said man. the Lan Xang stupid king that's why. Can I say where are those stupid kings come from ? 555 Luang Phabang555. I'm a luangphabang descent but I hate when I hear khon lao from luang phabang this and Luang pha bang that and Chao this and Chao that Oh man I'd like to throw up they say thing about Luang Phabang........



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

 Did you know why Chao Anouvong lost the war to Siam ? Not because of the Siam is bigger or more powerful armies, So give me the answer and I will give you mine... if you don't know I will not continue to debate you about lao history.


King Anouvong lost the war to siam because of stupid Lane Xang Kings wasn't sticking together during that time. Lao killing Lao instead of Lao killing siamese.  There was so stupid kings were raced to be top king.


 Ding Dong, Now I know that you're really knew our lao history. and I'll give you triple A brothers/Sisters. Well you already gave me the answer so I think I don't reakly have nothing say anymore. Yes, you're 1000000000000000% right of what you said man. the Lan Xang stupid king that's why. Can I say where are those stupid kings come from ? 555 Luang Phabang555. I'm a luangphabang descent but I hate when I hear khon lao from luang phabang this and Luang pha bang that and Chao this and Chao that Oh man I'd like to throw up they say thing about Luang Phabang........


There was so many times Siam tried to fight and take over Lane Xang before King Anouvaong era but they couldn't get the job done because during that time Lane Xang was ruling by one  smart King from King Fanguim to King Souryavongsa era.

Stupid uneducated King Luang Prabang, Champasack King and even [(Chao Noy Moung Phuan, King Anouvong's brother inlaw )], were helped Siamese troops defeated King Anouvong.    

EE LOOK KALEE " BUCK SURA NARY MAE MO " was another one so stupid that stabbed behind the back of King Anouvong.

Common Lao people, stop hating and blaming Siam or Thailand came and burned down Vientiane. If Lao be one Lao like Laos today, who dare to start the war with us?



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

 Did you know why Chao Anouvong lost the war to Siam ? Not because of the Siam is bigger or more powerful armies, So give me the answer and I will give you mine... if you don't know I will not continue to debate you about lao history.


King Anouvong lost the war to siam because of stupid Lane Xang Kings wasn't sticking together during that time. Lao killing Lao instead of Lao killing siamese.  There was so stupid kings were raced to be top king.


 Ding Dong, Now I know that you're really knew our lao history. and I'll give you triple A brothers/Sisters. Well you already gave me the answer so I think I don't reakly have nothing say anymore. Yes, you're 1000000000000000% right of what you said man. the Lan Xang stupid king that's why. Can I say where are those stupid kings come from ? 555 Luang Phabang555. I'm a luangphabang descent but I hate when I hear khon lao from luang phabang this and Luang pha bang that and Chao this and Chao that Oh man I'd like to throw up they say thing about Luang Phabang........


There was so many times Siam tried to fight and take over Lane Xang before King Anouvaong era but they couldn't get the job done because during that time Lane Xang was ruling by one  smart King from King Fanguim to King Souryavongsa era.

Stupid uneducated King Luang Prabang, Champasack King and even [(Chao Noy Moung Phuan, King Anouvong's brother inlaw )], were helped Siamese troops defeated King Anouvong.    

EE LOOK KALEE " BUCK SURA NARY MAE MO " was another one so stupid that stabbed behind the back of King Anouvong.

Common Lao people, stop hating and blaming Siam or Thailand came and burned down Vientiane. If Lao be one Lao like Laos today, who dare to start the war with us?


 Yes , Vietnam could run over Laos in one day and who dare to tell the Vietnamese army to stop smuggling Lao logs into Vietnam and dare to stop Vietnamese army from stealing gold  from Lao gold mine and Lao's land by the Laos and Vietnam border.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

its easy to point fingers and blame others for your misfortune. Laos is what its is today not because of one individual's action.If you're of Lao ethnicity, your ancestors played a role in Laos history as anyone else.Whether he/she was royalty, merchants, or a farmer.As a citizen of any nation/kingdom, you have a duty to do your part. But if it makes you feel better to keep blaming our past kings...



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

 Did you know why Chao Anouvong lost the war to Siam ? Not because of the Siam is bigger or more powerful armies, So give me the answer and I will give you mine... if you don't know I will not continue to debate you about lao history.


King Anouvong lost the war to siam because of stupid Lane Xang Kings wasn't sticking together during that time. Lao killing Lao instead of Lao killing siamese.  There was so stupid kings were raced to be top king.


It's no different in modern Lao history.  Look at Souphanouvong.  He trusted the Viet and look at Laos now.  



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:

its easy to point fingers and blame others for your misfortune. Laos is what its is today not because of one individual's action.If you're of Lao ethnicity, your ancestors played a role in Laos history as anyone else.Whether he/she was royalty, merchants, or a farmer.As a citizen of any nation/kingdom, you have a duty to do your part. But if it makes you feel better to keep blaming our past kings...


 We are lucky that there is Laos in the world map even Laos is conquest by the Vietnamese army.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

its easy to point fingers and blame others for your misfortune. Laos is what its is today not because of one individual's action.If you're of Lao ethnicity, your ancestors played a role in Laos history as anyone else.Whether he/she was royalty, merchants, or a farmer.As a citizen of any nation/kingdom, you have a duty to do your part. But if it makes you feel better to keep blaming our past kings...


 We are lucky that there is Laos in the world map even Laos is conquest by the Vietnamese army.


 I agree with you.  If France didn't stop Siam aka Thailand, Laos would not exist today.  Now Laos is under Vietnamese control.  

First Siamese.  Second French.  Now Vietnamese.  



__________________
Light Angel

Date:
Permalink   

Yes, I know them they were chao murders like their kings Marxis Lenin all they were war criminals since 1917 onward to the kings of Southeastasia as you mention. So according to the UN's building wall says:

True Prachao in the heaven he will certainly render judgment among the nations and set matters straight respecting many peoples. And they will have to beat their swords (weapons) into plowshares and their spears (neaclear bombs) into pluning shears.

 "Nation will not lift up sword against nation, neither will they learn war anymore Asiah:2:4, if those imperfectmen prachaos obeyed that reminders the inexperieced one would be wise and they would live with healthy forever. how this happening? Yes please keep on a good observer. thanks.





__________________
ນັກຮຽນລາວ

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:

Who was the best fighter in to defeat the enemies in Lane Xang history in between King Anouvong and Chao Lane Khamdeng?

How come Laos PDR's skipping to teach young Lao generation about King Ounheuan ( or Pra-Chao Samsenthai ) and Chao Lane Khamdeng?


 ຂ້ອຍເຄີຍໄດ້ຮຽນໃນ້ິຊາປະຫວັດສາດລາວຊັ້ນມັທຍົມສົມບຸນ ກ່ຽວກັບ ພະເຈົ້າອຸ່ນເຮືອນ ຫລື ພະເຈົ້າສາມເເສນໄທ, ເເຕ່ພັດໄດ້ຍິນກ່ຽວກັບ ເຈົ້າລ້ານຄໍາເເດງພຽງເເຕ່ໜ້ອຍດຽວ.



__________________
ນັກຮຽນລາວ

Date:
Permalink   

Light Angel wrote:

Yes, I know them they were chao murders like their kings Marxis Lenin all they were war criminals since 1917 onward to the kings of Southeastasia as you mention. So according to the UN's building wall says:

True Prachao in the heaven he will certainly render judgment among the nations and set matters straight respecting many peoples. And they will have to beat their swords (weapons) into plowshares and their spears (neaclear bombs) into pluning shears.

 "Nation will not lift up sword against nation, neither will they learn war anymore Asiah:2:4, if those imperfectmen prachaos obeyed that reminders the inexperieced one would be wise and they would live with healthy forever. how this happening? Yes please keep on a good observer. thanks.

 


 ສະຫລຸບເເລ້ວ ງົງໄປເລີຍ.



__________________
Vang Vang

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

 Did you know why Chao Anouvong lost the war to Siam ? Not because of the Siam is bigger or more powerful armies, So give me the answer and I will give you mine... if you don't know I will not continue to debate you about lao history.


King Anouvong lost the war to siam because of stupid Lane Xang Kings wasn't sticking together during that time. Lao killing Lao instead of Lao killing siamese.  There was so stupid kings were raced to be top king.


 ເຈົ້າ STUPID ເອງ ພັດໄປຫາໂທດທົ່ວທີບ, ປະວັດສາດກໍ່ຢ້ານບໍ່ເຄີຍໄດ້ຮຽນຊໍ່າຕີ້. ກອງທັບເຈົ້າ ອານຸວົງ ເສຍໃຫ້ກອງທັບສະຫຍາມ ກໍ່ຍອນວ່າ "ສະຫຍາມນີອາວຸດທີ່ທັນສະໃໝເຊັ່ນ: ປືນໄຟ" ເຊິ່ງໄດ້ມາຈາກການຄ້າກັບຕ່າງປະເທດ. ທຸກຄົນທີ່ໄປຕໍ່ສູ້ກັບເພິ່ນ ເເ່ມນສູ້ເພື່ອປົກປັກຮັກສາຜືນເເຜ່ນດິນ. ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າບໍ່ຮູ້ດອກ ວ່າເຈົ້າເປັນໃຜ ມາຈາກໃສ ເເລະໂຄດເຫງົ້າເຈົ້າເປັນເຊື້ອຊາດໃດ. ເເຕ່ກໍ່ຢາກເວົ້າວ່າ ເຈົ້ານັ້ນ ທັງໂງ່ ທັງປາກໝາ ວາຈາເຈົ້າກະຖ່ອຍ, ໂຄດຂອງເຈົ້າຄືຊິເປັນຄົນຂີ້ຄ້ານ  ເເລະກໍ່ ຢ້ານຕາຍຂະໜາດ...:( ເວດທະນາພວກກິນຂີ້ເເທນເຂົ້າດັ່ງເຈົ້າເເລະໂຄດເຊື້ອ.



__________________
Vang Vang

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:

The Greatest Kings of Laos.

  ☼. Prachao Ngyuen Kaison  Phomvihan

     ☼.    Prachao  Ho Chi Minh,

     ☼.    Prachao Pham Van Dong,

     ☼.    Prachao Vo Van Giap,

     ☼.    Prachao Khamtay Siphandone

     ☼.    Prachao  Nouhak Phomsavanh.

Their contribution to our beloved country is enormous

and immeasurable. Satu, Satu..


 ສະຫາຍຂຽນຜິສ່ຊື່ສຸດທ້າຍເດີ້ ທັດຈາກ ຄໍາໄຕ ສີພັນດອນ ກໍ່ຕ້ອງເເມ່ນ ຈູມມະລີໄຊຍະສອນ. ເວົ້າໄປເເລ້ວ ສອງຄົນນີ້ໂຄດໂກງບ້ານໂກງເມືອງ. ພວກເພິ່ນນີ້ ມີນ້ອງຮັກ ລູກຮັກເຕັມບ້ານ ເຕັມເມືອງພຸ້ນກໍ ເເຕ່ລະຄົນທີ່ເປັນນ້ອງຮັກ ເເລະລູກຮັກນັ້ນ ລ້ວນເເຕ່ເປັນພໍ່ຄ້າ ນາຍທຶນທັງນັ້ນ...hmm



__________________
Vang Vang

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

You know these Great KING I thing

you know the answer ?


 Jusy wonder!

How come most of Lao people are calling King Anouvong is Great King, even he wasn't defeated the enemy Siamese and he Couldn't save 3/4 LaneXang land to the Siamese.    Chao Lane Khamdeng was Striking back and defeated the enemy Anamese in Lane Xang history but, Laos PDR is not even allowing new Lao Historian to write in new Laos PDR history book for school teaching.   I see so many of Lao PDR people are blaming Thailand were changed the history of Lao Esaan to blindfold Khon Lao Esaan. How come don't they balame their own government?


 (Why Why and Why) ໂງ່ຫລາຍຕາຍຊະ ຈັງເເມ່ນໂງ່ ໂງ່ ເເລະກະໂງ່ເເທ້ໆນໍ້. ຕາຍໄປເທົ່າໃດຊາດ ເກີດມາໃໝ່ກໍ່ຍັງຊິໂງ່ ໂງ່ຢູ່ເເບບນີ້ລ່ະ. ມັນບໍ່ມີມື້ໝົດໄປດອກ ຄວາມໂງ່ຂອງເຈົ້າຫັ້ນ...ອະນາດເດ໋ ພວກມັກຖາມເເຕ່ Why why why ຫັ້ນ. ຮູ້ຮູ້ຢູ່ວ່າ ກ່ອນຊິມາເປັນອີ່ສານໃນທຸກມື້ນີ້ ອີ່ສານເຄີຍເປັນຊື່ຫຍັງມາກ່ອນ. ຮູ້ທັງຮູ້ ວ່າໃຜກັນເເທ້ທີ່ມັກປ່ຽນຄວາມຈິງຈາກປະຫວັດສາດ, ປະຫວັດສາດທີ່ວ່າ "ເຈົ້າ ອານຸວົງເສຍໄຊໃຫ້ກອງທັບຍ່າໂມ" ໂອ້ຍ ຈັງເເມ່ນສ້າງປະຫວັດສາດ ອັນທີ່ມັນບໍ່ເເມ່ນປະຫວັດສາດຂຶ້ນມາໄດ້ນໍ້

ສົມເພດ ສົມເພດ ເເລະກໍ່ເວດທະນາປະຫວັດສາດຄວາມຈິງຂອງເຈົ້າຫັ້ນເດະ.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:

YOU ARE SO SO STUPID TO CALL ALL THESE PEOPLE KING !! THEY ARE NOT KINGS YOU DUMB ASS!!

 ☼. Prachao Ngyuen Kaison  Phomvihan

     ☼.    Prachao  Ho Chi Minh,

     ☼.    Prachao Pham Van Dong,

     ☼.    Prachao Vo Van Giap,

     ☼.    Prachao Khamtay Siphandone

     ☼.    Prachao  Nouhak Phomsavanh.


           You OVERRATED   INTERNATIONAL MORON, off course they are not king but these dictators have more power than  traditional king.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Why did you get your ****ing head straight King Anouvong is  fighting to gain independent, different from Another king are fighting against the invader accept king Faghum fighting to United Lao , before you make any negative comment about your ancestor you should do your ****ing home work that's why i am so ****ing hate these ****ing people that they call themself Lao , these ****ing people are belong to Nazi gas Chamber and KKK hanging platform . 



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard