Members Login
Post Info TOPIC: Can Lao catch up with Vietnam???
Anonymous

Date:
RE: Can Lao catch up with Vietnam???
Permalink   


Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

 Q: Do we  have to catch up with Vietnam ? 

 A: In my opinion, we do not have to catch up with            Vietnam at all  in my opinion.

     Do you know why?

 The answer is: technically speaking we are the same COUNTRY or we

 will be the same country SOON called United Lao-Viet.

 Thus, Vietnamese people will have a right to owe land in Laos soon.


  What are you talking about ? Laos is Laos . Vietnam is Vietnam . Could Laos catch up with Vietnam ? The answer is Hell No. Laos is landlocked country and Laos is under Vietnam supervision . Every major project to be developed in Laos must be consulted and get permission from Vietnam . Every government building must have Vietnamese officers keep an eyes on Lao officers . Uncle Ho is their hero, not Jao Fa Ngum . Lao people had no longer have voices and power.


    So what it is meant that Laos and Vietnam is one country , it is Lao-Viet country today , like Lao- Isan and Siamese so it is Thailand today. If the French didn't take Champasak,Luang Prabang and Vientiane away from Siam , there would not have Laos in the world map and Laos might be like Esan and Lanna today.So even Laos is under Vietnamese rule but Laos is still existed in the world map.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:

 Q: Do we  have to catch up with Vietname ? 

 A: In my opinion, we do not have to catch up with            Vietnam at all  in my opinion.

     Do you know why?

 The answe is: technically speaking we are the same COUNTRY or we

 will be the same country SOON called United Lao-Viet.

 Thus, Vietnamese people will have a right to owe land in Laos soon.


 Vietnam people will have the right to owe land in Laos soon ? Soon my butt and kiss my large, if the red prince do not allow you Ong Viet went through Ho Ho Chi minh trail, you Ong Viet would have never made it to South Vietnam. period.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

 Q: Do we  have to catch up with Vietnam ? 

 A: In my opinion, we do not have to catch up with            Vietnam at all  in my opinion.

     Do you know why?

 The answer is: technically speaking we are the same COUNTRY or we

 will be the same country SOON called United Lao-Viet.

 Thus, Vietnamese people will have a right to owe land in Laos soon.


  What are you talking about ? Laos is Laos . Vietnam is Vietnam . Could Laos catch up with Vietnam ? The answer is Hell No. Laos is landlocked country and Laos is under Vietnam supervision . Every major project to be developed in Laos must be consulted and get permission from Vietnam . Every government building must have Vietnamese officers keep an eyes on Lao officers . Uncle Ho is their hero, not Jao Fa Ngum . Lao people had no longer have voices and power.


    So what it is meant that Laos and Vietnam is one country , it is Lao-Viet country today , like Lao- Isan and Siamese so it is Thailand today. If the French didn't take Champasak,Luang Prabang and Vientiane away from Siam , there would not have Laos in the world map and Laos might be like Esan and Lanna today.So even Laos is under Vietnamese rule but Laos is still existed in the world map.


 What a pathetic comments by you smart people.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Do you mean the Vietnamese will have right to OWN the land in Laos?

Not OWE right?   

There will be more than 10 million illegally Vietnamese are entering in Laos next 10 years, and next couple decades Laos PDR will have 100% Vietnamese nationality to be prime minister to lead the country.

--------------------------------------------------------------

 

First  of all, I want to correct this poster English usage. 

a). Own is  an adjective possesive.

b). Owe is a transitive verbe.

 Therefore; right to owe is the correct English usage.

The poster , who wrote this statement before you, is CORRECT.

 

Anywhere, Sooner or later Laos would be Vietnam. We have NO other CHOICE. Why did I say what I just said?

Lao land, according to this current migration exodus to Laos, would be full of SEA of  Vietnamese  soon probably by 2035. This is the fact. Thank you Souphanouvong and Kaison to allow this to happen.

 

To proove what I just said is right, take an expample of Vietnam  high school being build in Laos, Ho Chi Minh Statue being built in Laos,

 Laotien students being trainned in Vietnam, this is all VIETNAMIZATION of Laos. WE are CONVERGING to be FEDERAL STATE just like United States or U.S.S.R.

In this coming decade, Lao parliament would pass law REQUIRED that every Laotien student would have to take Vietnam language as SECOND language. By 2050, the majority of Lao people will be a ble to speak Vietnamese language statewide ( Statewide here I do mean Vietnam considers Lao as her renegate province in the West)

 

  As Vietnamese-born Laotien myself, I am eager and ecocentric to see this day COMING. I have been waiting to see this development for long long time. Finally, my dream becomes REALITY.

 

 Ngyuen Van Pham




__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:

Do you mean the Vietnamese will have right to OWN the land in Laos?

Not OWE right?   


 

First  of all, I want to correct this poster English usage. 

a). Own is  an adjective possesive.

b). Owe is a transitive verbe.

 Therefore; right to owe is the correct English usage.

The poster , who wrote this statement before you, is CORRECT.

 



Thank you for correcting OWE and OWN but you are totally wrong sir.

OWE and OWN are two different meaning:

- I borrowed your money $500, I paid you back $300. How much I still OWE you?

- I OWN this car after I paid it off, I OWE nothing to the bank now.

You see now two different meaning of these two words.


 



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

 Q: Do we  have to catch up with Vietnam ? 

 A: In my opinion, we do not have to catch up with            Vietnam at all  in my opinion.

     Do you know why?

 The answer is: technically speaking we are the same COUNTRY or we

 will be the same country SOON called United Lao-Viet.

 Thus, Vietnamese people will have a right to owe land in Laos soon.


  What are you talking about ? Laos is Laos . Vietnam is Vietnam . Could Laos catch up with Vietnam ? The answer is Hell No. Laos is landlocked country and Laos is under Vietnam supervision . Every major project to be developed in Laos must be consulted and get permission from Vietnam . Every government building must have Vietnamese officers keep an eyes on Lao officers . Uncle Ho is their hero, not Jao Fa Ngum . Lao people had no longer have voices and power.


    So what it is meant that Laos and Vietnam is one country , it is Lao-Viet country today , like Lao- Isan and Siamese so it is Thailand today. If the French didn't take Champasak,Luang Prabang and Vientiane away from Siam , there would not have Laos in the world map and Laos might be like Esan and Lanna today.So even Laos is under Vietnamese rule but Laos is still existed in the world map.


 What a pathetic comments by you smart people.


 The truth is the the truth. You could not lie to the people any more that communist system are good . Every body are equal my foot. Look at the leaders and their families are rich but the farmer and the majority of Laotian are very poor.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:

 Q: Do we  have to catch up with Vietname ? 

 A: In my opinion, we do not have to catch up with            Vietnam at all  in my opinion.

     Do you know why?

 The answe is: technically speaking we are the same COUNTRY or we

 will be the same country SOON called United Lao-Viet.

 Thus, Vietnamese people will have a right to owe land in Laos soon.


 This may not be a joke but it's sooooo funny .....heh..heh...heh.

Democratic Republic of Congo is perhaps the one that Laos will be able to catch up with - but Vietnam ? No way - not in this lifetime...With the current socio-political structure in place, Laos is like an old 100 tons elephant  being pulled out of a quicksand by a couple of hardcore members of the politburo. That's all I'm going to say. The rest is up to your imagination.

ເວົ້າມ່ວນຊື່ໆ ຢ່າສູ່ລຶບເດີ້



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

 Q: Do we  have to catch up with Vietnam ? 

 A: In my opinion, we do not have to catch up with            Vietnam at all  in my opinion.

     Do you know why?

 The answer is: technically speaking we are the same COUNTRY or we

 will be the same country SOON called United Lao-Viet.

 Thus, Vietnamese people will have a right to owe land in Laos soon.


 This may not be a joke but it'soooo funny .....heh..heh...heh.

Democratic Republic of Congo is perhaps the one that Laos will be able to catch up with - but Vietnam ? No way - not in this lifetime...With the current socio-political structure in place, Laos is like an old 100 tons elephant  being pulled out of a quicksand by a couple of hardcore members of the politburo. That's all I'm going to say. The rest is up to your imagination.

ເວົ້າມ່ວນຊື່ໆ ຢ່າສູ່ລຶບເດີ້


Stop insulting Laos . Any thing is possible just look at Singapore and south Korea . Singapore after 1969 was nothing but tinny island and the people were not educated and were living in poverty and it took their leader to educated the people and transform their country from the third world country to the most modern country in Asia . South Korea was completely broke after the war the people were starved . Now look at south Korea today is the most successful country and the most advance country in Asia unlike North Korea and Cuba. Laos is not a poor country . Laos have a lot of natural resources but the leader , the government and the system make the country and the people poor.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

 Q: Do we  have to catch up with Vietnam ? 

 A: In my opinion, we do not have to catch up with            Vietnam at all  in my opinion.

     Do you know why?

 The answer is: technically speaking we are the same COUNTRY or we

 will be the same country SOON called United Lao-Viet.

 Thus, Vietnamese people will have a right to owe land in Laos soon.


 This may not be a joke but it'soooo funny .....heh..heh...heh.

Democratic Republic of Congo is perhaps the one that Laos will be able to catch up with - but Vietnam ? No way - not in this lifetime...With the current socio-political structure in place, Laos is like an old 100 tons elephant  being pulled out of a quicksand by a couple of hardcore members of the politburo. That's all I'm going to say. The rest is up to your imagination.

ເວົ້າມ່ວນຊື່ໆ ຢ່າສູ່ລຶບເດີ້


Stop insulting Laos . Any thing is possible just look at Singapore and south Korea . Singapore after 1969 was nothing but tinny island and the people were not educated and were living in poverty and it took their leader to educated the people and transform their country from the third world country to the most modern country in Asia . South Korea was completely broke after the war the people were starved . Now look at south Korea today is the most successful country and the most advance country in Asia unlike North Korea and Cuba. Laos is not a poor country . Laos have a lot of natural resources but the leader , the government and the system make the country and the people poor.


 Be realistic and stop daydreaming. Singapore and South Korean have nothing in common with our beloved laoland. The role model and close allies of Laos are rather North Korea and Cuba. Remember, Singapore and South Korea hate communism and ruled by the rightists and are very close allies to the West. Laos is on the opposite side of the equation. As I said earlier, the socio-political structures in Laos have not been set up exactly to follow the same directions as those 2 advanced countries. Let's just take an obvious example : it takes a lot a human resource to do the jobs, education is the key but look at our lao system of education/to develop human resources.

You know what I'm talking about -family connection, political connection, corruption ...etc and how else can I put it ?

I don't want my beloved country to be a laughing stock of the other countries as well but when you tried to compare Laos with Singapore and South Korea I'm just dumbfouded.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

 Q: Do we  have to catch up with Vietnam ? 

 A: In my opinion, we do not have to catch up with            Vietnam at all  in my opinion.

     Do you know why?

 The answer is: technically speaking we are the same COUNTRY or we

 will be the same country SOON called United Lao-Viet.

 Thus, Vietnamese people will have a right to owe land in Laos soon.


 This may not be a joke but it's soooo funny .....heh..heh...heh.

Democratic Republic of Congo is perhaps the one that Laos will be able to catch up with - but Vietnam ? No way - not in this lifetime...With the current socio-political structure in place, Laos is like an old 100 tons elephant  being pulled out of a quicksand by a couple of hardcore members of the politburo. That's all I'm going to say. The rest is up to your imagination.

ເວົ້າມ່ວນຊື່ໆ ຢ່າສູ່ລຶບເດີ້


Stop insulting Laos . Any thing is possible just look at Singapore and south Korea . Singapore after 1969 was nothing but tinny island and the people were not educated and were living in poverty and it took their leader to educated the people and transform their country from the third world country to the most modern country in Asia . South Korea was completely broke after the war the people were starved . Now look at south Korea today is the most successful country and the most advance country in Asia unlike North Korea and Cuba. Laos is not a poor country . Laos have a lot of natural resources but the leader , the government and the system make the country and the people poor.


 Be realistic and stop daydreaming. Singapore and South Korean have nothing in common with our beloved legoland. The role model and close allies of Laos are rather North Korea and Cuba. Remember, Singapore and South Korea hate communism and ruled by the rightists and are very close allies to the West. Laos is on the opposite side of the equation. As I said earlier, the socio-political structures in Laos have not been set up exactly to follow the same directions as those 2 advanced countries. Let's just take an obvious example : it takes a lot a human resource to do the jobs, education is the key but look at our Lao system of education/to develop human resources.

You know what I'm talking about -family connection, political connection, corruption ...etc and how else can I put it ?

I don't want my beloved country to be a laughing stock of the other countries as well but when you tried to compare Laos with Singapore and South Korea I'm just dumbfounded.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

I've never tried to compare Laos to any country but love to see Lao leader and government to open their eyes and see the world , what have been happening in the world on the 21st century and see the different between elected government  ( democracy  system) and communist system ( dictator) and see the progress between the two system for example North and south Korea. North Korea , Cuba and Laos are not poor countries but the leaders and system make the countries and the people poor.

 

 



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

How could Laos catch up with the Vietnamese Master ? Vietnamese is Lao mastersince 1975.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Vietnam conquers Laos since 1975 like Siam conquer Esan, Lanna .



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Laos will get an independent from vietnam in about 200 years.



__________________
Nia


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 135
Date:
Permalink   

Thank goodness! I'm American. I would be very embarrass being Lao now since we are at the very bottom. I think Lao should blame the Lao Government for its bad leadership of the country. Lao Government leader's are very dumb and now Lao must suffer their failure. The longer Laos is at the bottom the harder for Laos to achieved it goals and competition in all level internationally.

__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

Nia wrote:

Thank goodness! I'm American. I would be very embarrass being Lao now since we are at the very bottom. I think Lao should blame the Lao Government for its bad leadership of the country. Lao Government leader's are very dumb and now Lao must suffer their failure. The longer Laos is at the bottom the harder for Laos to achieved it goals and competition in all level internationally.


 You are talking too far . First Laos must gain the independent and then you could talk about that. Every things and projects in Laos must be consulted with the Vietnamese and get the permission first before Lao government could sign and allow any body to do any thing in Laos.



__________________
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard