At the end of the day, it is just very dangerous and stupid to have a government that people cannot criticise. The government should be for and by the people in some way (vaguely democratic in intent, but people can choose how it operates - no need to be american) but a single party that denies all right to criticism is not developing laos. people who do business and foreign agencies develop laos. the party just benefits from it. this is a complete injustice and always will be.
You don't have to be rich to be a politician in the U,S, All of them get financial support from othe peoples, corporations, organizations and from the Federal governemt. You have to understand the U.S. politics. Don't have to be rich to play politics.
You don't have to be rich to be a politician in the U,S, All of them get financial support from othe peoples, corporations, organizations and from the Federal governemt. You have to understand the U.S. politics. Don't have to be rich to play politics.
Hillary Clinton just use $5 million of her own money to keep her campaign going. She probably didn't have enough money (from donors) to run the operation.
So tell me, if she wasn't rich you think she will be able to do that?
__________________
"Because I criticized Laos government and it policies, it does not mean I want Laos to remain poor nor do I think Lao people are lazy or uneducated."