"With the cultivation of their respective party and state leadership, the relationship of Laos and China are moving forward in a healthy and vigorous way. The positive momentum of development has been reflected in all aspects in the relationship -- politics, economy, education and tourism, etc. commented Lao Deputy Prime Minister Somsavat Lengsavad in an interview with Xinhua Thursday in the Lao capital Vientiane.
Somsavat, also head of the standing committee of the government, could not help expressing his amazement by his recent trip to Beijing as a guest at the 2008 Paralympic Games closing ceremony.
"Beijing has changed so much. The splendor and grandness of the Beijing Paralympic Games is the best illustration of China's progress. I consider this is the best ever Paralympics in the history. It is not only a pride of the Chinese, but also a boast for the whole Asia," he said.
Somsavat said that with a peaceful and friendly approach, China is exerting more and more important influence on the region and around the globe, from which the Lao-Chinese relationship has benefited.
Frequent exchange of visits by top officials, broadening economic cooperation, booming inter-trade and investment, and the take-off of educational and scientific cooperation, are among the achievements in this bilateral relationship, he said.
Taking tourism as example, Somsavat cited that number of tourists from Laos to China or vice versa both had a leap in recent years, which has benefited the tourism in both countries, but also strengthened understanding and friendship between the twopeoples.
He also particularly mentioned the educational cooperation withdelightment: "Chinese language teaching projects will be launched soon in schools along the Lao-Chinese borders. Lao officials are now discussing details about the projects with Chinese counterparts. We believe it would provide a better language environment for the prosperity of border trade."
When asked about how the local schools view the projects, the Deputy Prime Minister said, "It is due to this growing local demand that we started the plan. The children were so happy at thenews about setting up Chinese courses."
He noted that a plan to open a Confucius College, a Chinese-government-supported project for teaching Chinese language overseas, in Vientiane is already undergoing preparation.
He also praised China's role in especially the Great-Mekong Sub-region.
He rejected some speculations that flooding in this August in Laos around Mekong River, which runs through the borders between Laos and China, had been caused by the acts by China to discharge waters from dams along the Lancang River -- the part of Mekong inside China's borders.
He explained that the August flooding in Laos has not only took place along the Mekong river, but also many other areas around lakes in the upcountry, which has been caused mainly by particularly heavy rains during this year's rainy season.
It was not directly related to the water discharge from Lancang River on the upper side of Mekong, said Somsavat. Instead, other countries in the Mekong region should be grateful for China's consistent efforts in providing related hydrologic data in an bid to enhance the downriver flooding control, he said.
Lao Prime Minister Bouasone Bouphavanh will attend the West China Expo this October in Chengdu, China, and will also meet Chinese leader at this December's ASEAN Summit in Thailand. "I believe these exchanges and others in the future, will definitely upgrade the already good relations in all aspects between the two countries in a positive way," said the deputy premier.
Let 's talk about the relationship between Laos and china, On April 25, 1961, Laos and china established diplomatic relations and have maintained neighborly and friendly relations ever since. Between the late 1970s and mid 1980s, their relations suffered twists and turns. In 1989, however, Sino-Laotian relations returned to the normal.
Why the relation between Lao and China suffered in the late 70?? and continue untill the late 90?
[Why had the relations between Laos and China suffered in the late 70s and continued until the late 90s?]
did you know that the conflict between China and Vietnam in 1979? as you know that LAOS AND VIETNAM IS BROTHER!!
[Did you remember the conflict between China and Vietnam in 1979? As you know, Laos and Vietnam were brothers.]
Yes, I read the history and my memory is still vivid; nonetheless, without adjusting domestic and foreign policies according to a modern situation, Laos will suffer greatly. Therefore, I believe that Laotian government is doing what it can to balance the power and play the cards of Vietnam and China whenever it sees fit and benefit the country. I would be more concerned of Vietnam demarcating the border deeper into Laos if I were you as history had shown it many times in the past.
Frankly, I don’t see Laos has much leverage against either one of them; for instance, the desire to host the SEA games requires donation from all members of ASEAN states including Vietnam and China as well. As you can see, Laos does not have a choice. Isn’t it obvious to you?
They're striving to be something. Morals and Ethics are kept tight and controlled by the government. Creates harmony.
I picked up a book written by Sisouk Na Champassak. Its a contemporary piece written in 1961. He took a trip to China back them and recorded this in his book.
"We were impressed by the strong personality of our host, dubbed the "the tiger of Korea" for his military exploits at head of the Chinese "volunteers" in the Land of the Morning Calm. Assuring us that China would never attack Laos, since she only desired to maintain good neighborly relations with all countries of Asia, Peng declared in his energetic tone, "We are not afraid of the U.S. We beat them in Korea. We do not have atom bombs, but we have great manpower. Even if they were to use their atom bombs in case of war, they could never kill more than 300 of 400 million Chinese. That would still leave 200 million which would easily be enough to be them." These aggressive statements revealed to us the Chinese leaders' profound contempt for human life."
I honestly would like to say I'm glad both countries matured since then!
"We are not afraid of the U.S.We beat them in Korea. We do not have atom bombs, but we have great manpower. Even if they were to use their atom bombs in case of war, they could never kill more than 300 of 400 million Chinese. That would still leave 200 million which would easily be enough to be them." These aggressive statements revealed to us the Chinese leaders' profound contempt for human life." ----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t know how we would consider their profound contempt for human life was admirable. And the proclamation of a victory in Korean War was also questionable when taken all of the following into consideration: casualties, or wounded soldiers from all sides, the famine and starvation of Korean and Chinese combatants.
My conclusion of the Korean War was a result of the competition between American and the Soviet Union, which no doubt had caused so much pain and suffering for people in the peninsula. Korea had been colonized by Japanese until Japan lost in World War II and sadly, Korea did not get a chance to enjoy independence because the Red Army from USSR marched in from the north and installed Kim il Sung as its puppet government. The US was appalled and dismayed, so it too moved quickly to prevent all of Korea from becoming communist or I should say a Soviet satellite state. Under communist Kim il Sung with unification in mind, he invaded South Korea without any blessing from his protector. Then US went in to liberate South Korea and successfully evicted the communist forces, but the insubordinate MacArthur did not stop at the 38th parallel. He chased the communist army far beyond his initial assignment and he was about to conquer the capital city of North Korea.
Mao Ze Dong dispatched about 300,000 of its own army to rescue North Korea but they too paid a heavy price. After the war was ended, less than half of their men returned home and the combined losses between Communist Korea and Communist China was well over a million. American loss was barely 46,000 and South Korea still exists until today with much advancement and progress in every field. Therefore, it really depends how you define a victory.