44 Places to visit in 2009 by NY Times, Laos is not in the list !!!

Date: May 11, 2009

44 Places to visit in 2009 by NY Times, Laos is not in the list !!!

SeeHarHed · Guru

That's okay!!!! I think alot of people heard of Laos by now.. with bad and good press.

Date: May 11, 2009

I LOVE TO GO TO LAOS BUT!!!! EVERY THING ARE COST TO HIGHT. FOOD, HOTEL,TRAVEL EXSPEND.........
SAMPLES: GO TO THAILAND NO VISA COSTED, EVERY PLACES YOU GO THEY CHARGED YOU THE SAME AS THAI PEOPLES, SPECIALLY HOTEL ARE CHEAPPEST....... SORRY TO SAY THAT!

THAT'S WHY ???JUMP FROM RANK # 1 TO ?????? IT IS VERY SAD FOR ME disbelief

khonthakek · Guru

it is a bit surprised that Laos is not on the list, Mabye only 44 places or maybe economic crisis , poor tourism don't have enought money to travel.

Date: May 12, 2009

RE: From 44 to No name on the list, Feel Bad not at all . And I'm not surprised the way The New York Tmes Did their proceesed their Travel Magazines. Each year Number#1 May drop to Number#50, And Number50 may jump to Number#5 But that's way the Travel Agent, a Magazine, Books, or any Promotion do their Business.

Date: May 12, 2009

Vietnam number 1 in 2007, number 47 in 2008, and now do you see Vietnam in 2009 list ?

Only Thailand and Malaysia are in the list this year

tinko · Guru

?not on list. ha.

?would you want to wrinkle your forehead
thinking about it. confuse

probably not, i think. wink

however, laos is still on my list.
ny times can go and drown in the mekon along with that list. ha.

Date: May 12, 2009

That's okay...even China or Japan are not on the list.

Ake · Senior Member

Maybe our country no land to connect with the ocean..no beautiful beach..no luxury place for luxury tourist.

Lao only have backpackers tourists but no luxury tourists come. Things we have here but same as some part of Thailand so that's why? maybe?

-- Edited by Ake on Wednesday 13th of May 2009 03:16:23 AM