Who will win the war this time ? Will the Russian help Vietnam ? Will the United States help the old enemy (Vietnam ) ? China went to Pakistan and Bangladesh to regard India already ? Also every Africa countries including South and central America . Which side Laos should be ? Vietnam or China ? Laos must take side and could not stay neutral because both Chinese and Vietnam troop will fight in Laos regardless Laos like it or not.
Of course Russian will sell the submarines and weapons to Vietnam but not to send any Russian soldiers and the Russian weapon must be paid for . No more free guns and ammunition's. Friends is friend but business is monies. Russian want the Vietnam to have war with China so Russia could sell their weapon and slow down the Chinese economy and Chinese production. I don't know about the United States because the United State have their hands full with Iraq, Afghanistan and like Ebay and Syria and Iran and I don't think the United States could do any thing to help Vietnam plus the United states owned 700 billions dollars to China. Perhaps only Laos and Cambodia will help Vietnam.
china will invade lao, lao are the weakest and the easiest
This guy is easy to said china will invade lao and you are out of your mind, lao and china are good nieghbors so then Vietnam is good friend, then lao has to stay away from them. so let them fight and who care!!!
china will invade lao, lao are the weakest and the easiest
This guy is easy to said china will invade lao and you are out of your mind, lao and china are good nieghbors so then Vietnam is good friend, then lao has to stay away from them. so let them fight and who care!!!
ofcourse, we are good friends with china. china do whatever it likes in lao and noone said a damn thing. we lao love to think that our neighors are our friends but when things dont go their way, let see what will happen......good friends, wishful thinking
Who will win the war this time ? Will the Russian help Vietnam ? Will the United States help the old enemy (Vietnam ) ? China went to Pakistan and Bangladesh to regard India already ? Also every Africa countries including South and central America . Which side Laos should be ? Vietnam or China ? Laos must take side and could not stay neutral because both Chinese and Vietnam troop will fight in Laos regardless Laos like it or not.
You have asked a fascinating question...
I see two ways of look at your Question. One is the hypothetical, the other is the possibility. late last year, an elaborate internet hoax had media even believing there was truth to it. The result was wide spread concern across Vietnam in the informed peoples, But particularly in the North being that China did previously invade Vietnam in 1979. The hoax was that China was secretly massing troops and hardware near the border and were and planning to invade Vietnam. The peculiar part of this is that China flatly denied that there was any military build up, but did not deny there was something they might consider actually doing. the lack of statements from China to say thing like a good relationship existed and promises not to do such things left many wondering. One concerning issue is that this hoax was posted all over Chinese independent news pages, Which would be against Chinese law and yet no arrests made.
Vietnam's increasing exports have now placed China in a very competitive role. National Geographic in 2008 had a story about factory closures and people going hungry as a result of the growing economies of it's neighbors. there is then displayed a reason why politically China might such a thing.
So hypothetical is one that ca not be denied as having some possibility to it.
So What would U.S. do ? I think the memories and the political negatives from the last war there would be political suicide for any President or Congress to give support to it. Other concerns are China's allies, particularly North Korea with that mad man in control there. A war between China and Vietnam might remain at that, But to introduce its allies would cause the other to introduce theirs. the potential is then a bigger battle than just two sides. if that occurred, foreign Governments who are not allied to either side would be forced to consider its position, base on what would be the result if one side beat the other, and then keep going. I think the U.S. would give military aid to Vietnam, But would need something a heck of a lot bigger than the bay tonkin lie to convince the U.S. government that it would be a good idea to stick their nose in. given the U.S. Govts history striking back after being it would be suggest that if history continues to repeat itself, China would be guaranteed the U.S. would go off to another war if they struck the U.S. first. For example, a 911 or Pearl Harborstyle attack would be the catalyst. I also consider the widely held view across Vietnam that Chinese are not particularly nice people. this would suddest the people of Vietnam who would go off to war to resist an invading Chinese army would do so with passion, perhaps more so than North Vietnam against America. after all, in the war, most Vietnamese knew precious little about Americans, but already know a whole heap about Chinese. That being the case, the U.S. would have a very serious interest in watching . it would top of the list in the U.S. Presidents daily briefings. it is perhaps that concern held by Chinathat has held her back from not yet repeating what she did in 1979....
I will go with China to win the war again Vietnam. China has hi-tech now then ever and china has more advantage warships ,weapons and menpower who want fight with them now and i would said no body in the world.
I will go with China to win the war again Vietnam. China has hi-tech now then ever and china has more advantage warships ,weapons and menpower who want fight with them now and i would said no body in the world.
dont worry, after that china will take over you dumb lao land next . within a hour, lao will be gone
Who will win the war this time ? Will the Russian help Vietnam ? Will the United States help the old enemy (Vietnam ) ? China went to Pakistan and Bangladesh to regard India already ? Also every Africa countries including South and central America . Which side Laos should be ? Vietnam or China ? Laos must take side and could not stay neutral because both Chinese and Vietnam troop will fight in Laos regardless Laos like it or not.
This question should be for that guy BLM. I think he is the a person to ask. I agree he can be an ass sometime but he seems to know about China though.
IT'S NOT GOING TO BE HAPPEN, U.S. WILL NOT ALLOW CHINA INVADE VIETNAM.
LAOS SHOULD STICK WITH VIETNAM NO MATTER WHAT. NOTO WILL STOP CHINA
RIGHT AWAY IF CHINA ATART THE WAR WITH VIETNAM. REMEMBER VIETNAM ARMY
IS #2 IN THE WORLD AFTER U.S. CHINE USED UNDER CONTROLLING THE WHOLE
NATION BY JAPAN BEFORE.
Laos shouldn't stick with any body who are going to war. War is stupid.
Laos must learned the lesson when the Hmong's leader ( General Van Pao ) dragged Laos to go to war with North Vietnam when North Vietnam broke the peace treaty in Geneva. Laos was a neutral country but being bombed by the American and be invaded by North Vietnam. So either way if China invade Vietnam , both Chinese army and Vietnamese troop will use Laos land to fight and to supply their troop ,just like North and South Vietnam. Even Laos declare to be neutral country and Laos is still in no winning situation if China invade Vietnam. Damn stupid war is nothing but death and suffering.
IT'S NOT GOING TO BE HAPPEN, U.S. WILL NOT ALLOW CHINA INVADE VIETNAM.
LAOS SHOULD STICK WITH VIETNAM NO MATTER WHAT. NOTO WILL STOP CHINA
RIGHT AWAY IF CHINA ATART THE WAR WITH VIETNAM. REMEMBER VIETNAM ARMY
IS #2 IN THE WORLD AFTER U.S. CHINE USED UNDER CONTROLLING THE WHOLE
NATION BY JAPAN BEFORE.
Laos shouldn't stick with any body who are going to war. War is stupid.
Laos must learned the lesson when the Hmong's leader ( General Van Pao ) dragged Laos to go to war with North Vietnam when North Vietnam broke the peace treaty in Geneva. Laos was a neutral country but being bombed by the American and be invaded by North Vietnam. So either way if China invade Vietnam , both Chinese army and Vietnamese troop will use Laos land to fight and to supply their troop ,just like North and South Vietnam. Even Laos declare to be neutral country and Laos is still in no winning situation if China invade Vietnam. Damn stupid war is nothing but death and suffering.
If Laos didn't stick with any side Laos will be more suffer. During Vietnam war Laos announced a neutral country in Geneva but, Saigon pushed Phoumy Norsavanh army to fight against the Laos neutral army and CIA paid Vang Pao to destroy the neutral army also. The Laos Neutral army and Neo Lao Huck Sad was fight side by side against 2 troops of enemies like Royal of Laos forces and Vang Pao CIA army. In the earl 1964 Kong Lae troops beside with the Royal Laos army and early 1966 Kong Lae was drove out of Laos by Col. Somphet Sothsavanh in Vang Vieng.
You can't compare Vietnam war to China & Vietnam's. Vietnam war was civil war, China & Vietnam war should be the 3rd world war starter.
Typical Meo Chaofa low blow and racist remark. The funny thing is that these self-proclaimed smart Meo terrorists have had allowed themselves to be exploited by both the Thais and the CIA during the Indochina wars. At the end both of their former employers kicked them to the curve like a rabid dog; i.e. White Water and Thamkrabok.
For centuries these shameless nomadic tribesmen remain stateless. In order to boost up their self-esteem and ease their humiliation of not having a country of their own, they felt the need to drag the Lao down to join their rank.
Anonymous wrote:
dont worry, after that china will take over you dumb lao land next . within a hour, lao will be gone
IT'S NOT GOING TO BE HAPPEN, U.S. WILL NOT ALLOW CHINA INVADE VIETNAM.
LAOS SHOULD STICK WITH VIETNAM NO MATTER WHAT. NOTO WILL STOP CHINA
RIGHT AWAY IF CHINA ATART THE WAR WITH VIETNAM. REMEMBER VIETNAM ARMY
IS #2 IN THE WORLD AFTER U.S. CHINE USED UNDER CONTROLLING THE WHOLE
NATION BY JAPAN BEFORE.
Laos shouldn't stick with any body who are going to war. War is stupid.
Laos must learned the lesson when the Hmong leader ( General Van Pao ) dragged Laos to go to war with North Vietnam when North Vietnam broke the peace treaty in Geneva. Laos was a neutral country but being bombed by the American and be invaded by North Vietnam. So either way if China invade Vietnam , both Chinese army and Vietnamese troop will use Laos land to fight and to supply their troop ,just like North and South Vietnam. Even Laos declare to be neutral country and Laos is still in no winning situation if China invade Vietnam. Damn stupid war is nothing but death and suffering.
If Laos didn't stick with any side Laos will be more suffer. During Vietnam war Laos announced a neutral country in Geneva but, Saigon pushed Phoumy Norsavanh army to fight against the Laos neutral army and CIA paid Vang Pao to destroy the neutral army also. The Laos Neutral army and Neo Lao Huck Sad was fight side by side against 2 troops of enemies like Royal of Laos forces and Vang Pao CIA army. In the earl 1964 Kong Lee troops beside with the Royal Laos army and early 1966 Kong Lee was drove out of Laos by Col. Somphet Sothsavanh in Vang Vieng.
You can't compare Vietnam war to China & Vietnam's. Vietnam war was civil war, China & Vietnam war should be the 3rd world war starter.
young lao historian.
No body could predict that China invade Vietnam will be the world war lll . The same way that if the Iran has the nuclear bomb and Iran will use on Israel and wipe Israel of from the world map. Matter of fact China occupied Tibet and millions Asian Muslim who have different languages , different cultures and different religions and different races from the Chinese and also have been treated as a second class citizen and they want to be independent but being cold blood murdered by the Chinese but the world doesn't seem to care and no one doesn't dare to say a word or speak out. So If China just take Spratly island from Vietnam who would dare to help Vietnam to start the world war lll or Vietnam just give up the small island to be better off to loose the whole country and to save millions of lives. That would be best way for Lao people to see instead of war which will effect Laos directly. Stupid war.
Typical Meo Chaofa low blow and racist remark. The funny thing is that these self-proclaimed smart Meo terrorists have had allowed themselves to be exploited by both the Thais and the CIA during the Indochina wars. At the end both of their former employers kicked them to the curve like a rabid dog; i.e. White Water and Thamkrabok.
For centuries these shameless nomadic tribesmen remain stateless. In order to boost up their self-esteem and ease their humiliation of not having a country of their own, they felt the need to drag the Lao down to join their rank.
Anonymous wrote:
dont worry, after that china will take over you dumb lao land next . within a hour, lao will be gone
Do you want to bet idiot pussy lady boy that Laos will be exist until the end of the world .
Typical Meo Chaofa low blow and racist remark. The funny thing is that these self-proclaimed smart Meo terrorists have had allowed themselves to be exploited by both the Thais and the CIA during the Indochina wars. At the end both of their former employers kicked them to the curve like a rabid dog; i.e. White Water and Thamkrabok.
For centuries these shameless nomadic tribesmen remain stateless. In order to boost up their self-esteem and ease their humiliation of not having a country of their own, they felt the need to drag the Lao down to join their rank.
Anonymous wrote:
dont worry, after that china will take over you dumb lao land next . within a hour, lao will be gone
Do you want to bet idiot pussy lady boy that Laos will be exist until the end of the world .
Laotian are always going to have the country until the end of the world but the Hmong will never have the country until the end of the world.
Typical Meo Chaofa low blow and racist remark. The funny thing is that these self-proclaimed smart Meo terrorists have had allowed themselves to be exploited by both the Thais and the CIA during the Indochina wars. At the end both of their former employers kicked them to the curve like a rabid dog; i.e. White Water and Thamkrabok.
For centuries these shameless nomadic tribesmen remain stateless. In order to boost up their self-esteem and ease their humiliation of not having a country of their own, they felt the need to drag the Lao down to join their rank.
Anonymous wrote:
dont worry, after that china will take over you dumb lao land next . within a hour, lao will be gone
Do you want to bet idiot pussy lady boy that Laos will be exist until the end of the world .
Laotian are always going to have the country until the end of the world but the Hmong will never have the country until the end of the world.
no, i am pretty sure lao is gone in 10 or so years from now. maybe, in name but the country wont be ruled by ethnic lao. sad isnt it
Typical Meo Chaofa low blow and racist remark. The funny thing is that these self-proclaimed smart Meo terrorists have had allowed themselves to be exploited by both the Thais and the CIA during the Indochina wars. At the end both of their former employers kicked them to the curve like a rabid dog; i.e. White Water and Thamkrabok.
For centuries these shameless nomadic tribesmen remain stateless. In order to boost up their self-esteem and ease their humiliation of not having a country of their own, they felt the need to drag the Lao down to join their rank.
Anonymous wrote:
dont worry, after that china will take over you dumb lao land next . within a hour, lao will be gone
Do you want to bet idiot pussy lady boy that Laos will be exist until the end of the world .
Laotian are always going to have the country until the end of the world but the Hmong will never have the country until the end of the world.
no, i am pretty sure lao is gone in 10 or so years from now. maybe, in name but the country wont be ruled by ethnic lao. sad isnt it
Gone where ??? Siam ruled over Laos for over Hundred of years we're still Lao eat sticky Rice jump Padaek, and France (kee-nok) ruled over hundred of years too, we are still Speak lao and eat sticky rice jump (Hee-Falang) and lao PDR still run the country !!! I could careless if you're thai or Meo, But what you said is totally baseless......
Typical Meo Chaofa low blow and racist remark. The funny thing is that these self-proclaimed smart Meo terrorists have had allowed themselves to be exploited by both the Thais and the CIA during the Indochina wars. At the end both of their former employers kicked them to the curve like a rabid dog; i.e. White Water and Thamkrabok.
For centuries these shameless nomadic tribesmen remain stateless. In order to boost up their self-esteem and ease their humiliation of not having a country of their own, they felt the need to drag the Lao down to join their rank.
Anonymous wrote:
dont worry, after that china will take over you dumb lao land next . within a hour, lao will be gone
Do you want to bet idiot pussy lady boy that Laos will be exist until the end of the world .
Laotian are always going to have the country until the end of the world but the Hmong will never have the country until the end of the world.
no, i am pretty sure lao is gone in 10 or so years from now. maybe, in name but the country wont be ruled by ethnic lao. sad isnt it
But it won't certainly be ruled by Meo and you can bet your life on it.
Laos should stick with the winner who has more money and drop the loser like a rock. Show Laos the money then Laos will decision which side Laos will be . Money talk.
China has more monies so Laos should be on China side. So China could build more Dams, more casinos and more stadiums and more Chinese universities so millions Chinese would be settle in Laos.
China has more monies so Laos should be on China side. So China could build more Dams, more casinos and more stadiums and more Chinese universities so millions Chinese would be settle in Laos.
thats right, bro!
__________________
Page 1 of 1 sorted by
Samakomlao -> Samakomlao Main -> General -> Which side should Laos be if the Chinese invade Vietnam again like 1985 over Spratly island?
